Magnitude estimation of the 1900 earthquake in Venezuela based on its coseismic effects

dc.creatorVásquez, R
dc.creatorGuzmán, A L
dc.creatorRodríguez, J A
dc.creatorColón, S
dc.creatorAudemard, F
dc.creatorCabas, Mauricio
dc.date2020-07-13T18:41:35Z
dc.date2020-07-13T18:41:35Z
dc.date2020
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-22T13:59:24Z
dc.date.available2023-11-22T13:59:24Z
dc.descriptionThe 29 October, 1900, earthquake occurred in Venezuela triggered six landslides and six liquefactions located in the center-north region of Venezuela and La Tortuga island. Due to the location of the coseismic effects, the barycenter and the focal depth related to this earthquake, it was possible to calculate the magnitude by using several statistical methods. The results show a magnitude in the range 7.4-7.7 Mw, with an average value equal to 7.6 Mw, which is consistent with the instrumental magnitude of 7.6 Mw obtained by Fiedler (1988) and the macrosismic magnitude by Vásquez et al. (2018) equal to 7.5 ± 0.3 Mw estimated by using the Bakun and Wentworth (1997) method.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier1757-8981
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/6540
dc.identifierdoi:10.1088/1757-899X/872/1/012034
dc.identifier1757-899X
dc.identifierCorporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.identifierREDICUC - Repositorio CUC
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository-salesiana.heoq.net/handle/123456789/317801
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherIOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
dc.relation[1] Leal G., A., 2018. Contra temblores. Lecciones urbanas del sismo de San Narciso del 29 de octubre de 1900, en la ciudad de Caracas. Tesis doctoral, Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo, Universidad Central de Venezuela.
dc.relation[2] Leal G., A., Vásquez S., R., Rodríguez, J. A., Audemard, F. A., 2018. Reevaluación del terremoto del 29 de octubre de 1900 en Venezuela. Primera parte: estimación de intensidades. GEOMINAS, 77: 139-154.
dc.relation[3] Vásquez S., R., Leal G., A., Rodríguez, J.A., Audemard, F. A., 2018. Reevaluación del terremoto del 29 de octubre de 1900 en Venezuela. Segunda parte: cálculo de los parámetros de la fuente. GEOMINAS, 77: 225-237.
dc.relation[4] Colón, S., Leal Guzmán, A., Audemard, F., Vásquez, R. y José Antonio Rodríguez, En Prensa. Análisis macrosísmico del sismo Mw~7,6 de San Narciso del 29 de Octubre de 1900, aplicando la Escala Medio–Ambiental de intensidad sísmica ESI 2007. Revista de la Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Central de Venezuela.
dc.relation[5] Fiedler, G., 1988: Preliminary evaluation of the large Caracas earthquake of october 29, 1900, En: Lee, W., Meyers, H & Shimazaki, K. (Eds.) Historical seismograms and earthquakes of the world, San Diego, Academic Press: 201-207.
dc.relation[6] Vargas, A., 2002. Jean Paul. Deslizamientos inducidos por sismos y sus efectos en abanicos aluviales. Instituto Geofísico del Perú, v.3, p. 125-136.
dc.relation[7] Rodríguez, L. M., Audemard, F. A. & Rodríguez, J. A., 2006. Casos históricos y contemporáneos de licuación de sedimentos inducidos por sismos en Venezuela desde 1530. Revista de la Facultad de Ingeniería de la Universidad Central de Venezuela, 21(3):5-32.
dc.relation[8] Keefer, D. K., 1984. Landslides caused by earthquakes. Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 95, p. 406-421.
dc.relation[9] Papadopoulos, G. A. y Lefkopoulos, G., 1993. Magnitude-distance relations for liquefaction in soil from earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 83, No. 3, pp. 925 938.
dc.relation[10] Rodríguez, C.E., J.J. Bommer and R.J. Chandler, 1999. Earthquake-induced landslides: 1980–1997. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 18, 325–346.
dc.relation[11] Bird, J.F. y Bommer, J. J., 2004. Earthquake losses due to ground failure. Engineering Geology, 75, 147-279.
dc.relation[12] Keller, E. H. y Blodgett, R. H., 2004. Riesgos Naturales. Pearson Education S.A. Madrid.
dc.relation[13] Papadopoulos, G. A. y Plessa, A., 2000. Magnitude–distance relations for earthquake-induced landslides in Greece. Engineering Geology 58 (2000) 377–386.
dc.relation[14] Bommer, J. J. y Rodríguez, C. E., 2002. Earthquake-induced landslides in Central America. Engineering Geology 63, 189– 220
dc.relation[15] Keefer, D. K., 2002. Investigating landslides caused by earthquakes - A historical review. Surveys in Geophysics. 23 (6), 473-510.
dc.relation[16] Ambraseys, N.N. y Adams, R.D., 1996. Large-magnitude Central American earthquakes, 1898–1994. Geophysical Journal International 127, 665– 692.
dc.relation[17] Bakun, W. H., Wentworth, C. M., 1997. Estimating earthquake locations and magnitude from seismic intensity data. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 87: 1502-1521.
dc.relation[18] Peraldo, G. & Montero, W., 1999. Sismología Histórica de América Central, Universidad de Costa Rica, IPGH, México, 347 p.
dc.relation[19] Islas, O. C., & López, F. M. (2015). El domo generativo. Modelación morfológica y diseño parametrico. Base del estudio de ensambles modulares En la fabricación de prototipos para sistemas CAD-CAN. MÓDULO ARQUITECTURA CUC, 15, 105-132.
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.subjectEarthquake
dc.subjectVenezuela
dc.subject1990
dc.subjectCoseismic effects
dc.titleMagnitude estimation of the 1900 earthquake in Venezuela based on its coseismic effects
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.typeText
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
Files
Collections